On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:24:21PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > Reverts a part of an earlier patch. Why isnt this merged into 1 of 12? > > To give zero regression risk to 1/12 when MMU_NOTIFIER=y or =n and the > mmu notifiers aren't registered by GRU or KVM. Keep in mind that the > whole point of my proposed patch ordering from day 0, is to keep as > 1/N, the absolutely minimum change that fully satisfy GRU and KVM > requirements. 4/12 isn't required by GRU/KVM so I keep it in a later > patch. I now moved mmu_notifier_unregister in a later patch too for > the same reason.
We want a full solution and this kind of patching makes the patches difficuilt to review because later patches revert earlier ones. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
