On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 09:57 -0700, Ira Weiny wrote: > > One side comment on the non OpenSM aspect of this: > > > > Why is the node temporarily unavailable ? There is a "contract" that the > > node makes with the SM that it clearly isn't honoring. Is any > > investigation going on relative to this aspect of the issue ? > > > > Yes, we are working on finding the root cause. I agree that the "contract" is > not being honored. This is one of the reasons I was hesitant to implement any > fix to be submitted.
I think the two issues can be tackled in parallel. > I don't think this is truly a bug in the stack. Any ideas on what it is ? If not, would you be willing to try something assuming the end node issue is easily reproducible ? > However, I could see this causing issues for people[*] and it might be nice to > have a "fix". Sure; both are issues which should be understood better and fixed IMO. -- Hal > Ira > > [*] Particularly those who do not have any other connection to nodes other > than > IB. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
