On Wed, 7 May 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, authorship has been destroyed by at least two of the
> > patches (ie Christoph seems to be the author, but Andrea seems to have
> > dropped that fact).
>
> I can't follow this, please be more specific.
The patches were sent to lkml without *any* indication that you weren't
actually the author.
So if Andrew had merged them, they would have been merged as yours.
> > That "locking" code is also too ugly to live, at least without some
> > serious arguments for why it has to be done that way. Sorting the locks?
> > In a vmalloc'ed area? And calling this something innocuous like
> > "mm_lock()"? Hell no.
>
> That's only invoked in mmu_notifier_register, mm_lock is explicitly
> documented as heavyweight function.
Is that an excuse for UTTER AND TOTAL CRAP?
Linus
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
