On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You might want to read carefully what Linus wrote: > > > The one that already has a 4 byte padding thing on x86-64 just after the > > spinlock? And that on 32-bit x86 (with less than 256 CPU's) would have two > > bytes of padding if we didn't just make the spinlock type unconditionally > > 32 bits rather than the 16 bits we actually _use_? > > So you need to add the flag _after_ ->lock and _before_ ->head....
Oh should have taken my morning coffee first, before ->lock works obviously as well. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
