Olaf Kirch wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 19:58:11 Steve Wise wrote:
Yes, by adding flow control. And it could be iwarp-specific if you
want. I would not suggest relying on connection termination and
re-establishment as the way to handle this :).
No, not in the long term. But let's hold off on the flow control stuff
for a little - I would first like to finish my patch set and hand it
out for you folks to bang on it, rather than the other way round.
Okay with you guys?
What patch set? We can't run on chelsio's rnic with fmrs...
I assume nothing would fly that regresses IB performance. Worst case,
you have an iwarp-specific RDS transport like you do for TCP, I guess.
Hopefully though, IB + iWARP will be a common transport.
If it turns out that way, fine. If iWARP ands up sharing 80% of the
code with IB except the RDMA specific functions, I think that's
very much acceptable, too.
Olaf
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
