On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 23:43 +0000, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > On 13:40 Mon 12 May , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > Right; that's what I meant by option 1. > > True. > > > Also, it's not really unknown options since it's part of the > > NodeDescription. > > > > This works as long as the "known" options (currently s= and w=) are not > > part of NodeDescription. It works for the real life use case that > > started this. > > That is correct, but we know that ibsim parser doesn't parse > NodeDescription in those (port related) lines, so in such "worst" cases > when 's=' and/or 'w=' strings are used in NodeDescription this could be > just filtered out from ibnetdiscovery file.
That's why I termed this approach a workaround and it does limit the NodeDescription in ways not limited by the IBA spec. Is this worth mentioning in the README or some other doc for ibsim ? -- Hal > Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
