Sean Hefty wrote:
I agree. I don't have an issue with the rdma_cm issuing some sort of notification event when an IP address mapping changes. I would use an event name that indicated this, rather than 'disconnect'. If this is implemented, I'd like to minimize the overhead per rdma_cm_id required to report this event. Maybe instead of making this a cm_id event, we should add a concept of rdma async events that aren't necessarily affiliated with any particular cm_id? IE a new channel for these types. Then you can post it once when a route changes that affects rdma devices, for example... Stevo. |
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
