On Thu, 15 May 2008, Nick Piggin wrote: > Oh, I get that confused because of the mixed up naming conventions > there: unmap_page_range should actually be called zap_page_range. But > at any rate, yes we can easily zap pagetables without holding mmap_sem.
How is that synchronized with code that walks the same pagetable. These walks may not hold mmap_sem either. I would expect that one could only remove a portion of the pagetable where we have some sort of guarantee that no accesses occur. So the removal of the vma prior ensures that? _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
