On 5/19/08, Steve Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't understand your rationale above on why adding a new function is > better than using an extensive "set this option" function. Can you clarify? > > Function rdma_set_option() wouldn't be the mechanism to report the events. > It would be the mechanism to set an option indicating the cm_id wants > NETDEV_CHANGE events. Seems like the exact fit rather than a new API call > to set some very specific mode or option. I missed the QoS thread you're > referencing, so please excuse me if I'm rehashing something that has been > agreed-to in the past... >
Steve, I think there was some misunderstanding here, I am not against rdma_set_option, I just said that I would follow what would be decided over the review / maintainer decision. I am fine both with using a set_opt call or a dedicated call. Or.
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
