Forgot some important info: saquery BUILD VERSION: 1.3.6 OFED-1.3
On Tue, 20 May 2008, Matthias Blankenhaus wrote: > Howdy ! > > While using this tool to run some queries on a two port HCA, I noticed > some odd behavior. Here are my observations running on a SLES10SP2 > (x86_64) Intel Xeon with a Mellanox Technologies MT25208 InfiniHost III > Ex HCA: > > (01) saquery -C mthca0 -m > This yields the output for port number two. This is not conform with the > usual ib tools behavior to report on port one per default. > > (02) saquery -C mthca0 -m -P 1 > Fails with "Failed to find active port, check port status with "ibstat". > This is incorrect, since > > # ibstat mthca0 1 > CA: 'mthca0' > Port 1: > State: Active > Physical state: LinkUp > Rate: 20 > Base lid: 5 > LMC: 0 > SM lid: 1 > Capability mask: 0x02510a68 > Port GUID: 0x0008f10403987dc5 > > This might be the reason why (01) report on port two. > > (03) saquery -C mthca0 -m -P 2 > Works and is identical with the out out from (01). > > However, the following command options work: > > (04) saquery -P 1 -m > Correctly yields the output for port one. In other words > port one seems to be fine unlike reported in (02). > > (05) saquery -P 2 -m > Correctly yields the output for port two. > > > Is it incorrect to use -C and -P in combination ? Why does does > saquery think that port one is not active ? > > > Thanx, > Matthias > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
