Sean Hefty wrote:
OFED needs a separate list of maintainers
Does this refer to the issue that the kernel IB maintainers can't be
accountable for the OFED IB kernel code since it includes patches which
were never reviewed nor merged upstream, as Roland noted in his comment
(below)?!
Or
-----Original Message-----
From: Roland Dreier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 03:02
To: Or Gerlitz
Cc: Sean Hefty; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: the so many IPoIB-UD failures
introduced by OFED 1.3
> Maybe its about time for the Linux IB maintainers to get a little
angry?!
I'm not angry about it, although I have pretty much given up on trying
to debug IPoIB issues seen running anything other than an upstream
kernel. It seems like the OFED maintainers, the enterprise distros and
their customers should be more concerned about the failure of the OFED
process -- clearly producing something much buggier and less reliable
than the stock kernel is not what anyone wants.
- R.
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
