> Perhaps we should just pass in a u32 rkey for both WRs instead of the > mr pointer? Then the code could put the old rkey in the invalidate > WR, and the newly updated rkey in the fast_reg WR and chain the two > together and do a single post.
Makes sense to me. The only thing I would worry about would be if some device needs the actual mr struct pointer to post the work request, but mlx4 and I guess cxgb3 don't at least and I don't see a good reason why another device would. Let's go for it. - R. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
