Hi Al,
Al Chu wrote:
Hey Yevgeny,
Did ftree fail to digest the topology?
For the current OpenSM, on atleast one cluster, yes. I've been meaning
to look into it. Just haven't gotten to it yet.
OK, let me know if ftree is still unable to work on your topology
when you do get back to this - perhaps I'll need to tune it up a bit
There is some legacy too. Earlier ftree's weren't able to handle a
number of corner cases, so updn was used instead (and now is still
used).
Or perhaps that you need LMC>0, which ftree doesn't support?
This too.
Unless, of course, you need LMC>0, in which case ftree is useless.
-- Yevgeny
Al
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 09:24 +0300, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
Ira,
Ira Weiny wrote:
We run with the up/down algorithm, ftree has not panned out for us yet.
Can you elaborate on that?
Did ftree fail to digest the topology? Or did it do a lousy job configuring
the subnet? Or perhaps the you need LMC>0, which ftree doesn't support?
-- Yevgeny
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
