On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 20:13 +0300, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > On 08:48 Sat 31 May , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > No, PREFIX_MASK is being changed to 0xff10ffff00000000ULL to: > > 1. eliminate the scope part, and > > 2. get the entire signature > > for subsequent comparison. > > > > > why PREFIX_SIGNATURE is needed? Am I missing something? > > > > Because PREFIX_MASK masks the bits to compare and SIGNATURE is what it > > should be after masking. > > I see. Then shouldn't it (mask) be 0xff10ffff0000ffffULL?
Yes; updated patch to follow shortly. Similarly for INTF_MASK and I'll generate a separate path for that. -- Hal > Sasha > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
