> LSO is not exposed to user space by this patch, so maybe better to just reserve/skip this enum value?
Sure, not a big deal either way, I'll change it. > and this sets IBV_DEVICE_KERN_MEM_MGT_EXTENSIONS off, so at the bottom line > the user will never see IBV_DEVICE_MEM_MGT_EXTENSIONS being set to ON? or > the user space hw library should somwhow add this bit? Yes, the low-level driver library needs to look at it. I tried to explain it in the comment: + * If the kernel driver says that it supports memory + * management extensions, then move the flag to + * IBV_DEVICE_KERN_MEM_MGT_EXTENSIONS so that the low-level + * driver needs to move the flag back to show it supports the + * operations as well. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
