On 06:05 Thu 12 Jun , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > > > Right but why is OK to disrupt non base LID traffic but not base LID > > > traffic ? Is it only because it's only being used by one ULP > > > currrently ? > > > > How this disrupt non base LID traffic more than it was now? > > I didn't say that. I was asking why it's OK for non base LID traffic but > not base LID traffic.
Then I likely don't understand your question. What are you asking "why base LID preservation is useful"? I think I answered this already. > Isn't it that's it's many ULPs rather than just > MPI ? I don't see how the whole issue is related to MPI/non-MPI. Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
