On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 09:46 -0700, Ira Weiny wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:38:58 -0700 > Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 09:35 -0700, Ira Weiny wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:25:48 -0700 > > > Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 09:16 -0700, Al Chu wrote: > > > > > I asked the Lustre people in my hallway, and it isn't > > > > > currently configurable for Lustre. > > > > > > > > Wouldn't Lustre SL be inherited from partition based on underlying IPoIB > > > > interface ? > > > > > > I am not quite sure what you mean here? Our Lustre sets up their own > > > QP's via > > > the RDMACM. So I believe we could set our SL and/or partition for those > > > QP's > > > separately from IPoIB via a modify_qp call; right? > > > > RDMA CM does address resolution based on IP addresses and an SL can be > > associated with the outgoing IPoIB interface. > > > > Right, but does it _have_ to be the associated? I thought not.
Do you want a different SL from that ? There's a QoS syntax but I'm not sure how Lustre plays into that. -- Hal > Ira > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
