Roland Dreier wrote:
> Keep also the local (src) netdevice name in struct rdma_dev_addr. In a
High-Availability
> scheme this can be used by the rdma-cm to align RDMA sessions to use the
same links as
> the IP stack does under fail-over and route change cases.
Is the netdevice name the best we can do? It seems pretty fragile in
the face of renaming etc.
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
shouldn't it keep the netdev ptr? Like a neigh entry or a dst entry.
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
