On 09:39 Thu 26 Jun , Ira Weiny wrote: > One comment, which I mentioned to you off-list, was that passing struct > osm_opensm without having that header public currently breaks my plugin and > will make it impossible for them to compile against the installed headers.
Right, is is disadvantage. > I am really leaning toward including all the headers in the opensm-devel > package so plugin writers don't have to have a git tree to build. I think we can do it. Personally I will not build plugin against RPM package, IMHO plugin writing required OpenSM knowledge at a source code level. But others may want just to build plugin, so it can be useful. Want me to add this? Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
