Roland Dreier wrote:
This seems like needless churn to me. I personally prefer to see "sizeof foo" instead of "sizeof(foo)", since sizeof is not a function, and in any case I don't see much value in making this type of trivial change.
In the IB stack i noticed all of the variations of sizeof: sizeof foo or sizeof(foo) (and i think that i even saw) sizeof (foo)
IMHO, Changing all of the instances of "sizeof" from all of the variations to a unified one can make
the code look a little bit better ... Dotan _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
