> Thanks for writing up this patch. I have been extremely busy dealing with > some hot issues and hence the delayed response. I did see Shirley's > response and yes it looks okay to me too. In the same vein that we have > been distinguishing the nonsrq functions (from the generic or srq ones), > would you consider renaming ipoib_cm_init_rx_wr() to something with nonsrq > suffix? Thanks!
That would make sense but ipoib_cm_init_rx_wr() is also called from ipoib_cm_dev_init() even when an SRQ is available. So it's not really a "nonsrq" function. - R. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
