> What do you think of the following approach? > Instead of adding creation flags to the qp_init_attr, I can add a new verb: > ibv_qp *create_qp_extended(struct ibv_pd *pd, struct ibv_qp_init_attr, > *init_attr, enum ibv_qp_create_flags create_flags) > > I'm aware that adding a new verb isn't optimal, but at least we can > avoid incrementing the libibverbs version.
I think this new verb seems like a better approach right now. - R. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
