On 7/8/08, Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Olga, > > On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 18:27 +0300, Olga Shern (Voltaire) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have tested the same scenario with OpenSM. > > What I have expected to see is trap 259 because of switch enforcement > > that is done by OpenSM. I don't see this trap, therefore I assume that > > ANAFA > > Do you mean Anafa II ? > yes > > doesn't generate this trap (this is not mandatory only > > optional). > > Right, this trap is optional and I don't know whether or not it is > supported. Perhaps someone from Mellanox can comment on this to be sure. > > > I only see trap 257 that is generated by the node (with partial pkey) > > that sends the multicast traffic. > > Only when there is no switch enforcement ? > no, when there is switch enforcement, I see this trap generated by the node that sends multicast packets
> > The conclusion is that if there is switch enforcement the issue is not > > severe and we can live with it :) > > Would that be the case if those optional traps were supported ? > I think no > Thanks. > -- Hal > > > Olga > > > > On 6/26/08, Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 16:44 +0300, Olga Shern (Voltaire) wrote: > > > > Would you try this with OpenSM (and validate your theory about > > > > getting > > > > switch bad PKey traps v. end port bad PKey traps) or does VSM > > > > have such > > > > a mode (ingress/egress partition filtering) ? > > > > > > > > -- Hal > > > > > > > > Yes, I will test it with OpenSM > > > > > > Any update on this ? Thanks. > > > > > > -- Hal > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
