On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 00:17 +0300, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > On 13:53 Wed 09 Jul , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > > > It is just *.ver file, *.map is symbol versioning - there were additions, > > > no changes in existing functions API. > > > > Isn't that needed too when APIs are added ? > > I don't think. > > > Also, some existing > > functions had minor parameter changes (like const being added). > > Yes, but it does not touch ABI and doesn't affect a linker. > > > > > > this will take effect in the next daily build. > > > > > > > > The tar balls just issued won't be reissued ? > > > > > > There were some commits after this already. > > > > Shouldn't there be a branch for this if that is an issue ? > > And then to do libibmad-1.2.1.1? Looks like an overkill for this > particular case - 1.2.* is in development period and the issue is pretty > minor - we will fix it in today's daily build and in the next tarball > release.
Also, what about backward compatibility with apps built with the previous version of these libraries ? That's mainly a libibmad issue right now. I'm pretty sure there are some out of tree apps using libibmad based on some of the previous email traffic on this list. -- Hal > Sasha > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
