> You're still not using a separate cmd structure for 
> ib_uverbs_create_qp_expanded.
> It is NOT a good idea to use the 8-bit reserved field for 
> ib_uverbs_create_qp_expanded().
> You should use a different struct (as I indicated in my previous mail).

Sorry, I couldn't find the email you were talking about. can you
please resend it to me?
Why isn't it good to use the reserved field? Will it not just create
code duplication for creating a regular qp, and qp_expanded?

Ron


On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Jack Morgenstein
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> General comment:
> Please run checkpatch.pl -- there are lots of formatting errors here.
> See additional comments below.
>
> - Jack
>
> On Monday 21 July 2008 23:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> -ssize_t ib_uverbs_create_qp(struct ib_uverbs_file *file,
>> -                         const char __user *buf, int in_len,
>> -                         int out_len)
>> +static ssize_t ib_uverbs_create_qp_common(struct ib_uverbs_file *file,
>> +                                     const char __user *buf, int in_len,
>> +                                     int out_len, int expanded)
>>  {
>
>> -     struct ib_uverbs_create_qp      cmd;
>> +     struct ib_uverbs_create_qp cmd;
> unneeded modification
>
>>       struct ib_uverbs_create_qp_resp resp;
>>       struct ib_udata                 udata;
>>       struct ib_uqp_object           *obj;
>> @@ -1078,7 +1078,6 @@ ssize_t ib_uverbs_create_qp(struct ib_uverbs_file 
>> *file,
>>               goto err_put;
>>       }
>>
>> -     attr.create_flags  = 0;
>>       attr.event_handler = ib_uverbs_qp_event_handler;
>>       attr.qp_context    = file;
>>       attr.send_cq       = scq;
>> @@ -1087,7 +1086,7 @@ ssize_t ib_uverbs_create_qp(struct ib_uverbs_file 
>> *file,
>>       attr.sq_sig_type   = cmd.sq_sig_all ? IB_SIGNAL_ALL_WR : 
>> IB_SIGNAL_REQ_WR;
>>       attr.qp_type       = cmd.qp_type;
>>       attr.xrc_domain    = xrcd;
>> -     attr.create_flags  = 0;
>> +     attr.create_flags  = expanded ? cmd.reserved : 0;
> You're still not using a separate cmd structure for 
> ib_uverbs_create_qp_expanded.
> It is NOT a good idea to use the 8-bit reserved field for 
> ib_uverbs_create_qp_expanded().
> You should use a different struct (as I indicated in my previous mail).
>
> The common part is more difficult to isolate, since you have different cmd 
> structs, but
> it is possible.
>
>>
>> @@ -722,6 +726,7 @@ struct ib_qp *mlx4_ib_create_qp(struct ib_pd *pd,
>>                       return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>
>>               err = create_qp_common(dev, pd, init_attr, udata, 0, qp);
>> +
> unneeded change
>>               if (err) {
>>                       kfree(qp);
>>                       return ERR_PTR(err);
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to