Ron Livne wrote:
OK, but doesn't it contradict the approach you agreed on?
> What do you think of the following approach?
> Instead of adding creation flags to the qp_init_attr, I can add a new verb:
> ibv_qp *create_qp_extended(struct ibv_pd *pd, struct ibv_qp_init_attr,
> *init_attr, enum ibv_qp_create_flags create_flags)
>
> I'm aware that adding a new verb isn't optimal, but at least we can
> avoid incrementing the libibverbs version.
I think this new verb seems like a better approach right now.
When will we have all patches ready?
It must be this week if you still want it in OFED 1.4
Tziporet
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
