On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Adrien Guillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I still allocate a separate CQ for each QP right? You may use a separate CQ for each QP, if this is what you want (or you can use one CQ for all of those QPs). > > Also, I read > > http://www.hpcwire.com/features/17886984.html > > the author mentions doom and gloom for scalability. Is this just fear > mongering, or is this a real problem? If I use SRQ's am I in the > clear for scalability? Sorry, but i didn't read this article before and i don't have the time to do it now. But SRQ is an object which helps you create more scalable SW: if you have N QPs, and every QP may get M messages; in the past you had to post N*M WRs (M WRs to every QP). When using a SRQ, you can post much less WRs and SRQ is easier to manage because you can use the LIMIT event to know how many RR there are in the SRQ (QP don't have this feature).
Dotan > > Thanks. > > AJ > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
