Hi Hal, On 07:08 Wed 08 Oct , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > The question was whether you are sure that class 0x81 is not being > registered with ibdiagnet ? Was this actually verified at some level > rather than code inspection of ibutils ? Just to be sure...
Yes of course, umad2sim catches all application's ioctl()s... Sasha > >> That's the first thing to confirm or maybe you've already confirmed > >> this and it wasn't clear to me in what you wrote. If so, I have a > >> theory about what could be occuring. It may be the case that it is an > >> effect of the kernel MAD layer in that a MAD agent can send any class > >> and when using request/response it matches on transaction ID which > >> contains the MAD agent. Unsolicited messages on that other class > >> wouldn't get through though. I just ran a simple test of this and that > >> appears to be the case. > > > > This could explain the phenomena. And then it seems that similar > > mechanism should be implemented in umad2sim. > > Yes. > > -- Hal > > > Sasha > > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
