Sasha,
Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
Hi Yevgeny,
On 14:46 Thu 20 Nov , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
I can do something like the following patch, but I have
some strange feeling that I'm missing something...
I cannot see any errors here. But probably you can use simpler approach
- just cleanup all switch's lft_buf separately after ucast_mgr is
finished (including wait_for_pending_transactions()).
I've been doing some thinking...
Basically, what you're saying is that at the end of each and
every heavy sweep you will free ALL the lft_buf arrays, unless
there was some error, that should trigger a new heavy sweep
anyway. So what's the point of having lft_buf in the first place?
It was relevant in the beginning of ucast cache implementation,
but now after all the lft simplifications, I don't see how it
is used. Am I missing something here, or should we just remove
all these lft_buf and go back to single ucast_mgr_t.lft_buf?
-- Yevgeny
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
