> Things get worse if this patch > (http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2008-November/055680.htm l) > is applied since no event would be dispatched at all
Does this mean that you do not want the patches applied? (I have put them into the upcoming OFED 1.4) - Jack > -----Original Message----- > From: Moni Shoua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 4:27 PM > To: Roland Dreier; Jack Morgenstein > Cc: OpenFabrics General; Olga Stern; Or Gerlitz > Subject: [BUG REPORT] mlx4: Incorrect event is generated when > SM is changing > > > I have a small fabric with ConnectX HCAs and I run some tests > with 2 Open SMs that take over of each other (either by > discovering that the MASTER is not responding or by coming up > with higher priority). > > I noticed that in 2.6.28-rc6 I get in IPoIB a LID_CHANGE > event (while expecting CLIENT_REREGISTER) even though LID was > not changed. I looked where the events are generated in > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/mad.c:smp_snoop() > > if (pinfo->clientrereg_resv_subnetto & 0x80) > event.event = > IB_EVENT_CLIENT_REREGISTER; > else > event.event = IB_EVENT_LID_CHANGE; > > and see that clientrereg bit is off. > > I checked this simultaneously with a host running kernel > 2.6.27 and see that the bit is on and > CLIENT_REREGISTER is generated. > > Things get worse of this patch > (http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2008-November/ 055680.html) is applied since no event would be dispatched at all (BTW Jack, I think you forgot to send the second half for mthca) I'll appreciate a clue where does the reregister bit turned off. thanks MoniS _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
