So I'm finally understanding this patch. And I finally see that it is adding a 16-byte memcpy to the data path for every packet we send. Is the overhead of this really negligible? Can we think of a better way to handle this rare failure (double failover that causes an ARP to be lost) in a way that doesn't penalize the common datapath?
- R. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
