Doug Ledford wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 16:07 -0600, Steve Wise wrote:
I understand the desire to not release new features in a point release, but at the same time, these features are ready or near ready now. And prior features have definitely been released in point releases. (connectX for example). Another key point is that these features do not need the kernel rebase that will happen with ofed-1.5, which will take months...

Just more thoughts.  :)

I'm a bit late to this discussion, and you may have already talked about
this in the ewg teleconference, but I want to throw in my thoughts.

As far as new features goes, adding ConnectX support in a point release
is a huge difference from switching OpenMPI releases from a stable
series to the .0 release of the next series.  In the case of ConnectX,
it was "just another driver" and its addition should have had almost 0
impact on anyone not using that driver.  On the other hand, switching
OpenMPI versions changes the OpenMPI stack for everyone and has the
potential to create wide spread regressions should something go wrong.
So the risk factor comparison between these two actions simply isn't
valid.  One doesn't risk regressions for non-ConnectX users, one risks
regressions for everyone using OpenSM.

Good points.

One way to alleviate this is to ship both 1.2.8 and 1.3 in ofed-1.4.1 and mark 1.3 as "experimental". Then remove 1.2.8 in ofed-1.5 and make 1.3.x the production version for ofed-1.5.

I suggested this in the last conf call but folks didn't like the thought of testing both. But perhaps marking it "experimental" resolves this issue? So the iWARP vendors will test 1.3 and little to no testing is required for 1.2.8 since it has been qualified with ofed-1.4 QA.

Steve.


_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to