On 15:43 Tue 03 Feb , Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) wrote: > > > > This probably can work with updn and minhops, but it certainly will be > > destructive when LASH routing engine is used. LASH stores internal data > > between sweep cycles, it is used to answer correct SL value in SA > > PathRecord queries. So I think routing engine "switch" should be a bit > > smarter. > > > > that means that destroy and setup routing engine functions should be improved. > what do you suggest in the meantime?
I meant that instead of destroy/setup pair we need an update function which will carefully compare a current routing engine list against requested one and in any case will not destroy an routing engine(s) which is in use. > limit this to minhop/updn? No. Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
