On 15:50 Wed 04 Feb , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 15:03 Wed 04 Feb , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >> > > >> > For switch it will be an actual number of allocated physical ports > >> > (struct osm_physp) - port 0 olus number of external ports. For non > >> > switch nodes entry '0' is not used. > >> > >> Right. In my terms, physical is another name for an external port and > >> port 0 is not a physical (external) port so I think we're quibbling > >> about words. What do you think it should say ? > > > > I don't really have a good opinion :(. Maybe something like: > > > > * Returns the number of osm_physp ports allocated for this for node > > * (for switches it is number of external physical ports plus port > > * 0 and number of physical ports + 1 for non-switch nodes). > > Fine with me. Let me know if you want a patch for this.
If we are out of ideas then yes, send a new patch (still hope that you will find better description during this... :)). Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
