On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 01:53:19PM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 07:03 Thu 26 Feb ?? ?? , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> [snip...] > >> > >> > And in general I think it is better to use C-style comments - /* ... */, > >> > in C code and not C++-style // ... . > >> > >> Is this going to be enforced uniformly across OpenSM ? > > > > I didn't think about it (there are no many '//' comments), but I try to > > not introduce a new ones. > > Sent some patches relative to this. I'm not willing to take on > ib_types.h right now. Maybe someone else will.
Is this really worth doing? // is included in C99 and many other C99isms are already used in the source (well, until Sean removes them.. :) Jason _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
