On 13:50 Wed 04 Mar , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > clear) the resp_expected flag. It seems to me that a more robust > > strategy would be to set resp_expected to try to make sure that the > > other side sees the trap > > by handling the (trap repress) response matched by transaction ID > > > (and the timeout/retry strategy is used) > > if the trap repress is not received > > > There are a number of underpinnings to change to do this. Would you > > accept a patch along those lines ?
It could be done this way if it is a right thing to do. Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
