On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07:26 Thu 05 Mar     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> <snip...>
>> diff --git a/opensm/libvendor/osm_vendor_ibumad.c 
>> b/opensm/libvendor/osm_vendor_ibumad.c
>> index 2d53ff4..f393676 100644
>> --- a/opensm/libvendor/osm_vendor_ibumad.c
>> +++ b/opensm/libvendor/osm_vendor_ibumad.c
>> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static void clear_madw(osm_vendor_t * p_vend)
>>                       pthread_mutex_unlock(&p_vend->match_tbl_mutex);
>>                       OSM_LOG(p_vend->p_log, OSM_LOG_ERROR, "ERR 5401: "
>>                               "evicting entry %p (tid was 0x%" PRIx64 ")\n",
>> -                             old_m, old_tid);
>> +                             old_m, cl_ntoh64(old_tid));
>>                       goto Exit;
>>               }
>>       }
>
> I think this change was applied alredy with some another patch.

Yes, this was mistakenly included.

-- Hal

> Sasha
> - Show quoted text -
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to