As far as I'm aware, the response_expected handling is sufficient. BMGet and BMSet always have response. BMSend may be used both as a request from client to server, and as a response from server to client
-----Original Message----- From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 4:50 PM To: Itai Baz Cc: Sasha Khapyorsky; OpenIB Subject: Re: [PATCH] libibmad: added support for handling of BM (Baseboard management) MADs - FIXED without rmpp On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Itai Baz <[email protected]> wrote: > This patch adds support for handling of BM (Baseboard management) MADs. > > I checked Hal's comment regarding RMPP, indeed there is no need for it > for BM, so I have removed rmpp, and i'm using now mad_rpc Thanks. Also, is the response_expected handling sufficient ? For any BMSend, it will say no response expected. Is that what is really desired ? I'm not sure on what basis the BMA sets the response bit in the AM on a "response" to a BMSend but that is used in the kernel (to determine an incoming BM response). Should this mimic that idea ? -- Hal <snip...> _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
