Hi Sasha, On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote: <snip...>
>> + case 257: >> + case 258: >> + sprintf(buff, >> + "\t\t\t\tlid1.....................%u\n" >> + "\t\t\t\tlid2.....................%u\n" >> + >> "\t\t\t\tkey......................0x%x\n" >> + "\t\t\t\tsl.......................%d\n" >> + >> "\t\t\t\tqp1......................0x%x\n" >> + >> "\t\t\t\tqp2......................0x%x\n" >> + >> "\t\t\t\tgid1.....................0x%016" PRIx64 " : " >> + "0x%016" PRIx64 "\n" >> + >> "\t\t\t\tgid2.....................0x%016" PRIx64 " : " >> + "0x%016" PRIx64 "\n", > > Isn't IPv6 address format preferable for GIDs printing? Yes but it's consistent with other GID printing in this file so I didn't want this to stand out as different. -- Hal > Sasha
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
