Arlin, did we encounter this issue at interop? I do not recall seeing it. For IB, does Wait period between assigning the same QP# handles it? Thanks, Arkady
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Davis, Arlin R <[email protected]>wrote: > > To avoid duplicating port numbers between different tests, the next port > number to use must increment based on the number of endpoints per thread * > the number of threads. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Hefty <[email protected]> > --- > test/dapltest/test/dapl_server.c | 3 +++ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/test/dapltest/test/dapl_server.c > b/test/dapltest/test/dapl_server.c > index d589e7b..4d386fe 100644 > --- a/test/dapltest/test/dapl_server.c > +++ b/test/dapltest/test/dapl_server.c > @@ -480,6 +480,9 @@ DT_cs_Server (Params_t * params_ptr) > case TRANSACTION_TEST: > { > /* create a thread to handle this pt_ptr; */ > + ps_ptr->NextPortNumber += > + (pt_ptr->Params.u.Transaction_Cmd.eps_per_thread - > 1) * > + pt_ptr->Client_Info.total_threads; > DT_Tdep_PT_Debug (1,(phead,"%s: Creating Transaction Test > Thread\n", module)); > pt_ptr->thread = DT_Thread_Create (pt_ptr, > DT_Transaction_Test_Server, > -- > 1.5.2.5 > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > To unsubscribe, please visit > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > -- Cheers, Arkady Kanevsky
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
