> > As far as I can tell this is an infiniband only attribute. >I do not see > > it in iWarp RDMA spec, if I am wrong please point me to the >right place. > > > > How do we handle situation like this when there is a >difference between > > the two? > >Simplest thing to do in this case seems to be to handle it as an >extension on the iWARP side; just keep track of what the >consumer passed >in for sq_sig_type and if it's "signal all" then never post unsignaled >work requests. No reason to create gratuitous semantic >differences when >it's fairly easy to implement the union of IB and iWARP semantics.
For this issue, it is easy to resolve the difference and I don't have a problem implementing the extension as suggested by Roland. At the same time, I don't want to turn it into if an iWarp device does not do what an Infiniband device would do then it is a bug. I didn't take this issue that way as everyone said it with a :-) I'm probably making it a bigger issue than it is so I will stop now. :-) Chien _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
