On 11:03 Sun 02 Aug , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > Change routine to return success/failure status rather than > depend on debug assert > Also, fix callers of this routine to handle this return status > > Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <[email protected]> > --- > diff --git a/opensm/include/opensm/osm_path.h > b/opensm/include/opensm/osm_path.h > index 8d65d2c..7ef0fc5 100644 > --- a/opensm/include/opensm/osm_path.h > +++ b/opensm/include/opensm/osm_path.h > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ > * Copyright (c) 2004-2006 Voltaire, Inc. All rights reserved. > * Copyright (c) 2002-2005 Mellanox Technologies LTD. All rights reserved. > * Copyright (c) 1996-2003 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. > + * Copyright (c) 2009 HNR Consulting. All rights reserved. > * > * This software is available to you under a choice of one of two > * licenses. You may choose to be licensed under the terms of the GNU > @@ -188,15 +189,18 @@ osm_dr_path_init(IN osm_dr_path_t * const p_path, > * > * SYNOPSIS > */ > -static inline void > +static inline boolean_t
But why boolean? It is not logical operation, what is wrong with just int? Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
