Hey Sasha, On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:06:09 +0300 Sasha Khapyorsky <sas...@voltaire.com> wrote:
> Hi Ira, > > On 08:30 Mon 17 Aug , Ira Weiny wrote: > > > > The immediate benefit is coming with the multi-threaded implementation where > > I plan on adding the following function.[*] The discussion on the list has digressed from this patch. I still think this patch is valid and adds a level of flexibility which is needed regardless of what is decided about libibmad. Do you agree? Also, the last patch in the series ([PATCH 5/5] infiniband-diags/libibnetdisc: remove members of the fabric struct which are used in the scan only) cleans up some stuff from the external interface. If you really don't want to introduce a context object, then I can regenerate that final patch without the context. Ira > > Ok, but could we discuss first how will multithreading architecture be > implemented with libibnetdisc: goals (in particular is it support for > multithreaded apps or just multithreaded discovery function), interaction > with caller application, etc.? > > One of the desired feature of this I could think would be to keep API > simple for single threaded stuff. > > Sasha -- Ira Weiny Math Programmer/Computer Scientist Lawrence Livermore National Lab 925-423-8008 wei...@llnl.gov _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
