On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Chris Worley<[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Bart Van Assche<[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Chris Worley<[email protected]> wrote: >>> [ ... ] >>> I've found a good kernel/scst mix to easily repeat this; I can get it >>> to repeatedly hang w/ 8K block transfers running Ubuntu 9.04 w/ the >>> 2.6.27-14-server kernel on _both_ target and initiator (i.e. no WinOF >>> or OFED at all) and SCST rev 1062 on the target using one drive >>> (performance is >600MB/s, >80K IOPS, on the 8KB block sizes being >>> used). >>> [ ... ] >> >> Is there a special reason why you are using the 2.6.27-14-server >> kernel ? AFAIK the latest Ubuntu 9.04 kernel is 2.6.28-15-server. > > No special reason other than it didn't get upgraded w/ the rest of the > distro... started w/ 8.10. > > Do you think that kernel is better?
I noticed this while trying to reproduce this issue. I have no opinion yet about which of these two kernels is better. I'll downgrade the Ubuntu kernel in my setup. Bart. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
