On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <sas...@voltaire.com>wrote:
> On 09:20 Mon 21 Sep , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > <snip...>
> >
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Do a blocking query for the PathRecord.
> > > + */
> > > + status = osmtest_get_path_rec_by_lid_pair(p_osmt, slid, dlid,
> > &context);
> > > + if (status != IB_SUCCESS) {
> > > + OSM_LOG(&p_osmt->log, OSM_LOG_ERROR, "ERR 000A: "
> > > + "osmtest_get_path_rec_by_lid_pair failed (%s)\n",
> > > + ib_get_err_str(status));
> > > + goto Exit;
> > > + }
> >
> > It is not really "stress" testing, just pinging.
> >
> >
> > So are the other tests (additionally those use RMPP). Isn't repetitive
> > pinging a stress of a kind ?
>
> No. "Stress" test assumes full load.
What do you mean full load ?
> In "ping" case the only one thread
> is loaded and in only request processing time.
>
I'm not following what you mean by this.
>
> >
> >
> > > Shouldn't it be clarified in test description?
> >
> >
> > Same level of description as other tests. They all could be made more
> > descriptive.
>
> Agree. And we need to start somewhere.
>
Separate patch ?
-- Hal
>
> Sasha
>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
