Bart, I really appreciate all your work here. It looks like you've really bullet-proofed scst, and well defined where ib_srp has issues.
Thanks, Chris On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Bart Van Assche <bart.vanass...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Bart Van Assche > <bart.vanass...@gmail.com> wrote: >> My hypothesis is that in your setup running ib_srpt with thread=0 >> resulted in SRPT's completion queue handler (srpt_completion()), which >> keeps running as long as more completion queue elements can be >> processed, took up too much time, and that this finally resulted in >> remote SRP initiator disconnects. > > An update regarding the SRPT and SRP issues reported in this e-mail thread: > * At least on my setup, the latest SRPT revision (r1153 or later) runs > fine -- all issues reported in this (really long) e-mail thread > should have been resolved in that SRPT revision. > * Unfortunately this doesn't mean that the SRP initiator lockup is > gone. I'm still able to trigger this issue, both with the SRP > initiator included in the mainstream Linux kernel and with the SRP > initiator included in OFED. More details can be found here: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14235 and > https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1745. > > Bart. > _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
