On Friday 08 September 2006 16:07, Glyn Normington wrote: Cool!! I am surprised I could follow that entire reasoning without much problem...
> Lastly, a relation R is reflexive if for each element x it deals with (I'll > spare you the mathematical terms), x R x. You can take any binary relation > R and define another relation from the transitive closure of R together > with all the relationships x R x and you get a reflexive transitive > relation which is called, unsurprisingly, the "reflexive transitive > closure" of R. However, this part _I_ don't understand. Not even a bit ;o) One part is the formal definition, but how about something in real world that makes sense? Would it be like (Niclas nuisanceOf Niclas) ? If so, does this contribute any in our space? Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
