On Thursday 12 October 2006 03:06, Raffael Herzog wrote: > My question was actually a different one: Think of plugging in OSGi. Are > there any holes in this? Or is it, on the contrary, too open, so it's > too much work to realise an OSGi plugin?
One can support OSGi at various levels, from adding OSGi headers to manifest of all Jars, even if they are not intended to be bundles, all the way to fully versioned resolution of packages and a compiler that doesn't uses Jar level classpaths. What level is suitable, is probably depending on who you talk to. Jeff McAffer would probably push the package capable compiler and all of that, because that is a competitive edge that Eclipse has right now, where personally I think that might be unnecessary overkill. Others may have different opinion. Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
