On Tuesday 19 December 2006 05:50, David Leangen wrote: > There's only one thing that I find a bit confusing. IIUC, your > meaning of "page" differs from the wicket meaning of "page". > > In pax-wicket, a "page" can be any component.
Then there is something astray with the docs and/or my explanations. Page is Page, as Wicket defines it. Please point out where this is not followed. In Pax Wicket, we have "PageContent" which is a model of a Page, as a Page is not contained in other pages as general components are. Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
