guy's i was not planning to suggest xml in any way, just wanted to point out that we might be moving in the direction of rsp-ui where wolfgang and renan are basing it on wicket. especially if we get to am api of content aggregators we might look at what is available from the workbench api.
/peter On 2/15/07, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <message> > <title>Why Not?</title> > <paragraph> > <sentence><word>After</word><space/><word>all</word><comma/ > ><word>it<apos/>s</word><space/><word>human</word><space/ > ><word>readable></word><comma/><word>right</word><questionmark/> > </paragraph> > </message> > > > On Feb 15, 2007, at 17:31, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > > On Thursday 15 February 2007 15:54, Peter Neubauer wrote: > >> possibly introducing xml > > > > No XML! > > > > Niclas > > > > _______________________________________________ > > general mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
